My Peec AI Review for AI Search Visibility [Updated August 2026]
My Peec AI Video Review
Peec AI is an AI search visibility tool that helps businesses monitor their visibility in AI search engines such as ChatGPT, AI Overviews, and Perplexity. It also helps you to understand your brand's sentiment and how to improve your AI search visibility in comparison to your competitors.
It is built and run by Peec AI in Berlin, and as of August 2026 the company says it is used by more than 3,000 brands and agencies.
✓ Best for:
|
✗ Not ideal for:
|
What are the key features of Peec AI?
- Monitors your brand visibility: You can monitor how visible your brand is on the biggest AI search engines.
- Competitors check: You have a quick comparison of your competitors. This helps you understand how you're doing and what content is giving more visibility to your competitors.
- Real-time AI chat overview: Peec AI allows you to analyse real-time conversations in which your brand is mentioned and the content of these conversations.
- Actions: a prioritised list of citation opportunities, clustered by source type and scored 1-3. Added since the original review. See details below.
.webp?width=618&height=323&name=Peec%20AI%20landing%20page%20(1).webp)
Peec AI's home page
Peec AI at a glance (verified August 2026)
This table replaces the subjective 1-5 scoring I used in the original version. Scores were my opinion; the rows below are checkable facts, each verified against Peec's own pricing page, documentation or AI-instructions page in August 2026.
| Attribute | Peec AI, as of August 2026 |
|---|---|
| What it is | AI search visibility monitoring (mentions, position, citations, sentiment) for brands and agencies |
| Engines on standard plans | Choose 3 from six: ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity, Gemini |
| Engines platform-wide | Up to 11 per the pricing page (13 per Peec's AI-instructions page). Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5 Search, DeepSeek, Qwen and Mistral are Enterprise-tier, via API |
| Extra engine on a standard plan | €25/mo (Starter), €55/mo (Pro), €115/mo (Advanced) — adds from the same six core engines |
| Price (annual billing) | Starter €70/mo · Pro €180/mo · Advanced €360/mo · Enterprise custom |
| Price (monthly billing) | Roughly €82 / €212 / €420 — annual billing saves 15% |
| Prompts included | 50 (Starter) · 150 (Pro) · 350 (Advanced) · custom (Enterprise) |
| Projects | 1 · 2 · 5 · unlimited |
| Countries per project | 1 · 3 · 3 · unlimited. No extra charge for additional countries or languages within your plan |
| Refresh frequency | Daily on all tiers (Enterprise can choose daily or weekly) |
| Users | Unlimited on every tier |
| Actions engine | Included on all plans at no extra cost |
| AI traffic attribution | Not available. No traffic estimation, no citation-to-lead attribution |
| Integrations | Looker Studio (Advanced+), API and SSO (Enterprise only), MCP integration |
| Data collection method | Scraping the LLM user interfaces for the six core engines (confirmed to me by Peec support in 2025); API for the Enterprise-tier models |
| Company | Peec AI, Berlin. Founded 2025, ~$29M raised, 70+ employees — see the company section below |
Choose Peec AI if…
- You track the mainstream engines and three of them is genuinely enough
- You want daily data and a dashboard non-specialists will open without training
- You have the people to act on a prioritised list — Peec now tells you where the opportunity is, not how to write the piece
- Sentiment tracking matters to you and you don't want to pay €450+ elsewhere for it
Look elsewhere if…
- You need to prove AI visibility turned into pipeline — nobody should buy Peec expecting attribution
- DeepSeek, Claude, Grok, Qwen or Mistral coverage is a requirement and Enterprise pricing isn't in budget
- You want the tool to do the execution as well as the diagnosis
- You need more than three engines without an Enterprise conversation
How did I test Peec AI?
The hands-on test was made in October 2025, on a paid Pro account, for a real client. Be aware that these AI tools evolve quickly, and features are removed and added weekly — this review is a case in point.
I have personally tested Peec AI as part of a larger effort to test all the major AI search visibility platforms. This is not an AI-generated review based on the opinions of others.
Yes, I used ChatGPT to run deep research about Peec AI. But the goal was to find the most accurate information about this tool.
For the August 2026 update: I re-verified pricing, engine coverage and the Actions feature against peec.ai/pricing, docs.peec.ai and peec.ai/ai-instructions on 28 August 2026. I have not re-run the platform hands-on, and I have not personally used Actions. Where that matters, I flag it in the text rather than passing documentation off as testing.
Can Peec AI provide you with business-relevant metrics?
To give you a helpful answer, I will be focusing on a few aspects that I consider essential as a marketer working for businesses that need to monitor their AI search visibility:
- Does Peec AI have multi-AI-engine coverage?
Yes — but the honest answer is more complicated than either my original review or Peec's own summary suggests, and the difference costs money.
On Starter, Pro and Advanced you pick three engines from a core six: ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity and Gemini. Not three plus the rest. Three, total. Adding a fourth costs €25/month on Starter, €55/month on Pro or €115/month on Advanced, and it still has to come from that same list of six.
DeepSeek, Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5 Search, Qwen and Mistral are Enterprise-tier, tracked via API. So my original line — "it has them all except DeepSeek" — was wrong, and I've corrected it. Peec can track DeepSeek. But most readers of this review, on a plan they can buy with a credit card, cannot.
One small inconsistency worth knowing about: Peec's pricing page says Enterprise covers "up to 11 LLM models", while its AI-instructions page lists 13 including Grok and Claude Haiku. If the exact count matters to your buying decision, get it in writing from sales rather than trusting either page.

Peec AI's AI search engines to track
- Does Peec AI offer a good user experience?
Peec AI's user experience is pretty good. Not too many functions to distract you. You enter. You set up your business in 3 minutes. You have the right column with all the AI search tools. Just in case you need it, Peec AI is organising a group onboarding session to explain how the platform works.
- Does Peec AI offer a good amount of data for its price?
The price/data ratio is reasonable, with one caveat that has grown more important since the pricing change: you are paying for prompts and models, and the three-engine cap on standard plans means the cheapest way to broaden coverage is often to move up a tier rather than buy add-ons.
Sentiment tracking is included from Pro upward, which still compares well against tools charging €450+ for the same thing.
- Does Peec AI give accurate and trustworthy data?
Yes, to an extent. At regular intervals (usually daily), Peec AI queries each supported AI with your tracked prompts.
Peec AI simply runs a few of your prompts through multiple AI search engines based on your selection. It's real-time, essentially.
This is enough to convince me that Peec AI's data is trustworthy. However, it is difficult to determine the trustworthiness of the "sentiment". Each AI search visibility tool has its own algorithm to calculate it.
One point I'd now push harder on: if the core six engines are scraped from the UI and the Enterprise models are queried via API, those are two different collection methods producing numbers that sit in the same dashboard. I'd want to understand how comparable they are before treating them as one dataset.
- Does Peec AI offer actionable tips beyond just data?
Yes — and this is the biggest correction in this update. The original October 2025 review said Peec offered no playbook and no auditing layer. That is no longer true.
Peec now includes an Actions engine on every plan at no extra cost. According to Peec's product documentation, it clusters your citation sources into content types — owned pages, editorial coverage, reference sites and UGC communities such as Reddit — calculates a Relative Opportunity Score from 1 to 3 based on how often models cite that source type and where competitors are beating you, and returns prioritised steps to win those citations.
Two caveats I want to be straight about. First, I have not used Actions hands-on; the description above comes from Peec's documentation, not from my own testing. Second, "prioritised opportunity" and "turn-key execution" are not the same thing. Actions appears to tell you where to go win a citation. Someone on your team still has to write the piece, pitch the publication or join the thread.
- Can you connect AI citations to the number of clients you receive?
No. Peec AI does not offer built-in, end-to-end AI referral attribution (i.e., it won't tell you "this ChatGPT mention → X visits/leads"). It's a monitoring/analytics tool for AI answer visibility (mentions, position, sentiment, citations), not a traffic/ROI attribution platform. This has not changed since the original review, and Peec did not dispute it.
- Does Peec AI offer a brand's sentiment tracking?
Yes, it does, and it's included from the Pro tier upward — €180/month on annual billing, around €212 on monthly. It's very intuitive, and you find the brand's sentiment tracking as soon as you land on the page.

Peec AI's sentiment metrics
- Does Peec AI offer a good brand presence overview?
Yes, it gives you all the information you need for a brand presence overview:
- AI search visibility compared to your competitors
- AI search visibility compared to non-direct competitors
- Historical trend over the last 30 days (I hope Peec AI will introduce a longer period benchmark).
How does Peec AI's AI search visibility work?
The fundamental question here is: Does Peec AI use APIs, or does it scrape the actual web interfaces of AI platforms?
To be honest, I had some concerns about this point in 2025. Peec AI's documentation was basic. And I don't know if it was possible to understand these things by using the tool; I certainly couldn't.

This is me trying to find some concrete info after 20 minutes of research
And I did not want to base my review on the opinion of others who did not have direct access to the platform. So I decided to write to the assistance, and this is what they told me: <<We're scraping LLM's UI>>.

My conversation with Peec AI's customer service
By visiting the platform, it seems that I can confirm it (but I'm a marketer, not an API specialist):

Peec AI's AI chat conversations
August 2026 note: Peec's current pricing page labels the Enterprise-only models — Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-5 Search, DeepSeek, Qwen, Mistral — as "API". So the picture today looks like a hybrid: UI scraping for the six core engines, API access for the Enterprise additions. My recommendation to Peec's team stands and has actually become more urgent: document this properly, because buyers deserve to know which numbers came from which method.
By watching their demo videos, they also mention that they run these prompts daily. Can I verify this information? Yes, I can, they run the prompts daily indeed:

The list of prompts executed daily for a specific topic
What data does Peec AI search visibility collect?
Peec AI runs brand- and topic-specific prompts across the AI engines you have selected and logs whether and how your brand is mentioned. This visibility dataset is refreshed daily on every tier.
AI search brand visibility
Of course, Peec AI offers AI-powered search to boost brand visibility. It's intuitive and easy to set up. I find this feature particularly useful: when I click on a competitor's name, the AI search engine shows me where these competitors are mentioned.
.webp?width=2400&height=1256&name=app.peec.ai__competitor=kw_112e6560-fda0-4899-b798-6d53e1561b21(Mac%20Screen).webp)
List of prompts mentioning competitors
AI traffic analytics
Even if you pay extra, Peec AI does not provide an estimate of AI traffic, and it cannot connect a citation to a visit or a lead. If attribution is what you are buying, this is the wrong tool — and it is the one criticism from the original review that still stands entirely unchanged in August 2026.
Brand sentiment tracking
Peec AI offers brand sentiment tracking and provides a comparison with your main competitors.
In October 2025 my criticism was that it's just a number, with no way to see the conversations behind it. Peec did not address this point in their August 2026 outreach, so I am assuming it is unchanged. If you are evaluating the tool, ask about it directly.
A suggestion for Peec AI's team that I'll repeat: it would be very useful to surface two or three conversations that are pulling the sentiment down (on Reddit, LinkedIn, or Quora). Then I could offer my perspective on the situation and actually learn from the negative sentiment.

Peec AI's sentiment metric
Where does Peec AI take the information?
I always try to answer these questions by consulting first-party data. And this is the answer that Peec AI's chatbot gave me based on their documentation:

So here I had to make my own assumptions based on evidence and testing. My answer is that Peec AI runs your tracked prompts in the AI engines and captures the actual responses those models return. This is how Peec AI gets its information.
What do I think about Peec AI's data quality?
I trust them, but I'm also aware that Peec AI is just a tool that provides a data interpretation. As such, I find their data useful, but I do not expect them to be bulletproof (I have the same feeling even with bigger providers like Semrush or Ahrefs).
Is Peec AI's data sufficient for me to make content marketing decisions? Yes, and I'm happy with that.
What would I improve in Peec AI's visibility tool?
My original answer here was "actionable insights", and Peec has since shipped Actions to address exactly that. Credit where it's due.
What I would still want, as of August 2026:
- Attribution, or an honest statement that it will never come. Right now buyers assume a visibility tool will eventually connect to pipeline. Peec should say either way.
- Sentiment with receipts — the conversations behind the number, not just the number.
- More than three engines below Enterprise. The three-model cap is the single biggest constraint on the standard plans, and it isn't obvious until you're in the buying flow.
- Clearer technical documentation on scraping versus API, and how comparable the two datasets are.
- Longer historical benchmarks than 30 days.
Peec AI's Pros |
Peec AI's Cons |
User experience
Technicalities
Actionability
|
Coverage limits
Attribution
Depth
|
How is Peec AI's user experience?
Since the first minute I entered, my comment was: <<Nice user experience>>.
Pretty intuitive:
- You sign in
- You put your business information in the tool
- You choose the prompts you want to track
- You land on the landing page
Here is what impressed me about Peec AI: It offers onboarding assistance to get familiar with the platform ASAP. You'll find a button at the top of the first page as soon as you enter. Well done, team!

Peec AI's calendar to book a kickstart session
Once you're on the main page, the interface is quite rich in information, but not overwhelming:

How Peec AI's interface looks
Another aspect of Peec AI's user experience that I find interesting is the following: If you click on one of the 'Recent Chats' mentioned above, you can access the actual AI chats. This is a pretty handy way to quickly understand your "mentioning position".
Peec AI also scores highly on UX with their "suggested prompts". This feature helps any business kick off their AI search visibility monitoring, even if they have no idea what prompt to use.

Peec AI's list of suggested prompts
How much does Peec AI cost?
Peec AI costs €70 to €360 per month on annual billing, or roughly €82 to €420 on monthly billing, with a custom-priced Enterprise tier. These figures were verified on peec.ai/pricing on 28 August 2026 and replace the €89 / €199 / €499 structure quoted in the original October 2025 review, which Peec has since retired.
| Plan | Price (annual) | Prompts | Engines | Notable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | €70/mo (≈€82 monthly) | 50 | 3 of 6 | 1 project, 1 country, daily tracking, chat support |
| Pro | €180/mo (≈€212 monthly) | 150 | 3 of 6 | 2 projects, 3 countries, chat + email support |
| Advanced | €360/mo (≈€420 monthly) | 350 | 3 of 6 | 5 projects, 3 countries, multi-country, Looker Studio |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | All models | Unlimited projects, API access, SSO, DeepSeek/Claude/Qwen/Mistral/GPT-5 Search, dedicated support |
Add-on costs
Additional engines are priced per plan, because the cost scales with your prompt volume: €25/month on Starter, €55/month on Pro, €115/month on Advanced. Note that add-ons draw from the same six core engines — you cannot buy your way to DeepSeek from a standard plan.
Agency pricing
Peec sells separate agency bundles (Essential, Growth, Scale and a custom Comprehensive tier) with centralised billing and flexible prompt allocation across client projects. Current agency figures are on Peec's pricing page.
Free trial
Peec advertises a free trial. In October 2025 this was seven days with no credit card required; confirm the current terms at signup, as I have not re-tested the signup flow.
Here's what I think about Peec AI's pricing:
The repricing has made Peec meaningfully cheaper at entry level — €70/month for a real multi-engine tracker is competitive — while the top of the range has moved up.
The thing to model before you buy is the three-engine cap. If you need four or five engines on Pro, your real cost is €180 plus €55 per extra engine, and at that point Advanced or a different tool starts to look better.
Scalenut remains at the lower end of the market, while Ahrefs Brand Radar and Profound sit at the higher end. Peec now sits closer to the middle-to-lower end than it did in 2025.
Peec AI vs Profound: which should you choose?
This is the comparison we get asked about most often, so here is the short version.
| Peec AI | Profound | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | €70/mo annual | Enterprise-oriented, materially higher |
| Best at | Fast setup, clean UX, daily multi-engine tracking a whole team will use | Depth of analysis and enterprise reporting |
| Engine coverage | 3 of 6 on standard plans; more at Enterprise | Broad by default |
| Buy it if | You're a brand or agency that wants visibility data quickly, without a procurement cycle | You're an enterprise with budget and need depth over speed |
My read: Peec wins on time-to-value and price; Profound wins on depth and enterprise fit. If you are choosing between them and the deciding factor is "will my team actually log in every week", that points to Peec. Read our full Profound review for the other side of the comparison.
Peec AI alternatives and competitors
Peec is one of roughly forty tools in this category. The ones most often shortlisted against it:
- Profound — the enterprise choice. More depth, more budget.
- Otterly AI — lighter and cheaper, good for small teams starting out.
- Scrunch AI — strong for SaaS and B2B tech, broader platform coverage.
- Semrush AI Toolkit — worth it if you already pay for Semrush and want AI visibility inside one login.
- Scalenut — the value option at around €100.
- Promptwatch — persona-first analysis and rigorous data quality.
For the full landscape, see our comparison of the best AI search visibility trackers after testing 40+ tools.
Who is behind Peec AI? Company background
Buyers of a young category tool reasonably want to know whether the vendor will still exist in two years. The facts, from Peec's own company pages as of August 2026:
- Founded: 2025, with the product launching in February of that year
- Headquarters: Berlin, Germany (Karl-Liebknecht Str. 14, 10178 Berlin), with a New York office opened in 2026
- Team: 70+ employees
- Funding: approximately $29M raised in total — a seed round in July 2025 led by 20VC, followed by a $21M (€18M) Series A in November 2025 led by Singular
- Customers: Peec states more than 3,000 brands and agencies
- Ratings: Peec cites 4.9/5 on G2 (we have not verified the review count behind that figure)
That is a well-funded company growing quickly in a crowded category. The risk here is not insolvency; it is the ordinary risk that a fast-moving product changes underneath you — which is exactly why this review needed updating in the first place.
Frequently asked questions about Peec AI
Does Peec AI track DeepSeek?
Yes, but only on the Enterprise tier, via API. Starter, Pro and Advanced plans let you choose three engines from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity and Gemini. DeepSeek is not among them, and add-on engines draw from that same core six.
How many AI models does Peec AI track?
Peec's pricing page states up to 11 LLM models on Enterprise; its AI-instructions page lists 13. On any plan below Enterprise you track three at a time.
How much does Peec AI cost per month?
€70 (Starter), €180 (Pro) and €360 (Advanced) per month on annual billing, or approximately €82, €212 and €420 on monthly billing. Enterprise is custom-priced with no published figure.
Does Peec AI have a free trial?
Yes. Peec advertises a free trial; when tested in October 2025 it ran seven days with no credit card required.
Does Peec AI tell you what to do, or just what is happening?
Both, as of 2026. The Actions engine — included free on every plan — clusters citation sources into owned, editorial, reference and UGC categories, scores each opportunity 1-3, and returns prioritised steps. It identifies the opportunity; your team still executes it.
Can Peec AI show whether AI search drove revenue?
No. Peec has no AI traffic estimation and no citation-to-lead attribution. If proving pipeline impact is your primary requirement, Peec alone will not do it.
Is Peec AI worth it?
For teams that need reliable daily visibility monitoring across the mainstream engines, with a dashboard people will actually open, yes — particularly at the €70-€180 tiers. For teams that need broad model coverage on a standard plan, or attribution to revenue, no.
What is my conclusion on Peec AI?
In October 2025 I called Peec AI a visibility tracker rather than a strategy tool: good at telling you what's happening, not what to do about it.
That verdict needs revising. With Actions included on every plan, Peec has closed the biggest gap I identified — at least on paper. It now points at where the citation opportunity is. What it still doesn't do is execute for you, or prove that any of it turned into revenue.
My pricing verdict: better than it was. €70/month at entry is genuinely competitive, and the €180 Pro tier with sentiment included is good value. Watch the three-engine cap.
My conclusion: Peec AI is a strong choice for brands and agencies that need trustworthy daily AI visibility data, clean UX and a prioritised list of where to go win citations — provided you have the people to act on it, you can live with three engines, and you are not expecting it to prove ROI.
Publication history: This review was originally researched and published in October 2025, based on hands-on use of a paid Peec AI account for a real client. It was updated on 28 August 2026.
What changed in the August 2026 update, and why. Peec AI's team contacted us in August 2026 to flag that parts of the original review had gone out of date. We checked each point against Peec's own pricing page, product documentation and AI-instructions page before changing anything. Three things were genuinely outdated and have been corrected: Peec now ships an Actions engine (the original review said it had no playbook), the pricing has changed entirely, and Peec can track DeepSeek — though not on the plans most readers will buy, which is a nuance the vendor's own summary left out. We also added sections on alternatives, the Profound comparison and company background.
An honesty note on method. The hands-on testing in this review is from October 2025. I have not re-run a full hands-on test of the platform for the 2026 update — the corrections and new figures below are verified against Peec's first-party sources, and I have labelled them as such. Where I have not personally used a feature, I say so.
You May Also Like
These Related Stories
-1.png)
My Scrunch AI Visibility Review (SaaS and B2B Tech Focus)
-1.png)
My LightSite AI Review: Balancing Technical + Content Plays in AI SEO
.png)
